// pipeline modules

Custom AI model selection, fine-tuning, evaluation & serving

Modules that ship measured quality — not “we fine-tuned something.” Local GPU capacity when corpora cannot leave; cloud models and multi-model routes when APIs win on quality and cost.

// 01 audit

Model audit

Baseline quality, cost, and risk of your current stack — golden set sample, latency p95, and failure modes written down.

eval_baseline cost_map risk_register
// 02 finetune

Fine-tune program

Dataset hygiene, training loops, and acceptance tests. Loss curves tracked; overfit caught before it hits prod.

val_loss↓ golden_set local_gpu?
// 03 serve

Private serving

On-prem or VPC inference with monitoring. When data cannot leave, we serve on local GPU with ops you can staff.

p95_latency healthchecks rollbacks
// 04 route

Router design

Multi-model routing for cost vs quality — frontier APIs, smaller open weights, or specialist heads behind one interface.

multi_model cost_cap fallback
acceptance
metrics first
regression
gate:on
privacy
local_gpu
handoff
your team owns

// prepare a model scope

For a useful assessment, share the job and current baseline, representative examples with sensitive details removed, available data and its constraints, target quality measure, expected usage, latency budget, and where inference may run.

Fine-tuning is one option. Read when fine-tuning is worth testing before choosing a model path.

Discuss model scope